 | Matt Ledbetter, Free Safety | CLEM |
| Current/Potential | TAK | SACK | PD | INT | TD |
| 42/53 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Clemson Tigers |
|
| Attributes |
| Morale: | Content |
| Height: | 5-9 |
| Weight: | 170 |
| Ideal Wt: | 174 |
| Jersey: | 40 |
| Age: | 20 |
| Year: | Jr |
| Status: | OK |
| Energy: | 0 |
| HS Ranking: | #2593 |
| Pos Ranking: | #128 FS |
|
| Position Ratings |
| Hands: | 32 |
| Tackling: | 46 |
| Coverage: | 43 |
| Punt Return: | 38 |
| Kick Return: | 48 |
| Durability: | 64 |
| Endurance: | 65 |
| Adaptability: | 52 |
|
| Athletic Ratings |
| Arm Strength: | 1 |
| Acceleration: | 34 |
| Agility: | 48 |
| Speed: | 39 |
| Strength: | 35 |
| Jumping: | 33 |
| Instincts: | 28 |
| Aggressiveness: | 49 |
| Discipline: | 28 |
| Intelligence: | 88 |
| Work Ethic: | 58 |
|
| Personal Bests |
| Tackles: | 4 |
| |
| Sacks: | 0 |
| |
| Passes defensed: | 1 |
| |
| Interceptions: | 1 |
| |
| TD: | 0 |
| |
|
| Game Logs |
| Week | Opp | Res | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | FF | PD | Int | Yds | Ave | TD | MT | OOP | BPA |
| 6 | @NAVY | L | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | @FSU | L | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | UMD | L | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | @WAKE | L | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | - | - | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Defensive Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
| 2054 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2056 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | - |
|
| Turnover Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
| 2056 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| Scouting Report | Potential |
| His blitzing ability such reach a point where it is advantageous to his game. He should improve to the point where he can do an adequate job in man coverage. He's more than willing to put in the work necessary to end up with good agility. He'll eventually have the strength needed to simply outmuscle most of his competition. |
|
|
|